01

2010 humans have an attention span of a goldfish, we have been subconciously been driven towards our phantasitical way of thinking. A 50 inch TV screen introduces one to a new bigger entertainment world but it is only a matter of short amount of time that the size reduces to unsatisfactory luxuary which will lead one to further Bigness.
The current attention span requires the new building to be a pavilion. Topic of sustainability should be taken forward in line with re-useability not permanence.

Provocativeness is more accessible than serenity(Ectasy?). ( Prostitution is more accessible than sex? Geometry is more accessible than architecture?)

Is the new geometry subconciously encouraging us to be postitutues?
Architects have encourged the phantasitical mind in public rather than a directed mind.
Can we argue architects are the reason behind human failure.
Can we argue that humans are a product of their architecture or they should be.

-Shima 20100411